Another Sign of Too Much US Debt: India Trades Dollars for Gold

Economics, Social Issues — By Harrison on November 5, 2009 at 6:00 am

With U.S. debt at an all time high and numerous Democratic proposals on the table to raise it further, is it any wonder that countries are getting rid of their dollar stockpiles for something that won’t keep dropping in value?

Gold prices yesterday surged to an all-time high after India’s central bank bought 200 tonnes of the precious metal, swapping dollars for bullion as the country’s finance minister warned the economies of America and Europe had “collapsed”.

India’s decision to exchange $6.7bn (€4.54bn, £4.08bn) for gold equivalent to 8 per cent of world annual mine production sent the strongest signal yet that Asian countries are moving away from the US currency.

The reason, of course, is two fold.  On the one hand, U.S. consumers have no problems going into debt.  In fact, the average U.S. household has about $8,000.00 worth of credit card debt.  On the other hand, the U.S. government is spending money it doesn’t have as if it were going out of fashion.  To be sure, this is a problem both political parties have created as voters refuse to punish politicians who vote for more and more spending.  The $787 billion “stimulus” spending Obama signed into law earlier in the year just made things worse (with interest that figure jumps to $1.24 trillion).

Countries that hold huge dollar reserves (like China, India, and Japan) as getting stung – badly.  Even as they collect more dollars the erosion of the value of this currency means they are losing more and more money each day.  They are in a Catch-22, however, for if they make a move, such as India did, to exchange their dollars for gold, the price of gold shoots up as a result and they pay more to escape their dollar doom.

India’s move is proof of that (also from the Financial Times as above):

The purchase by New Delhi’s Reserve Bank from the International Monetary Fund pushed gold prices to a record $1,087.45 per troy ounce, up 2.6 per cent on the day, as traders bet that other central banks would also become buyers.

You guys are jumping ship, arent you?

You guys are jumping ship, aren't you?

As a result, there is a need to get away from the dollar and instead create an international “basket” of currencies:

China called for the creation of a new currency to eventually replace the dollar as the world’s standard, proposing a sweeping overhaul of global finance that reflects developing nations’ growing unhappiness with the U.S. role in the world economy.

The thinking by these countries is very logical for if they can somehow reduce their exposure to dangerous American fiscal practices and reckless consumer spending then they will be less affected by the fate of America.  However, China has a problem in that it is dependent upon American consumers (who are deeply in debt) for its income:

Chinese officials are frustrated at their financial dependence on the U.S., with Premier Wen Jiabao this month publicly expressing “worries” over China’s significant holdings of U.S. government bonds. The size of those holdings means the value of the national rainy-day fund is mainly driven by factors China has little control over, such as fluctuations in the value of the dollar and changes in U.S. economic policies. While Chinese banks have weathered the global downturn and continue to lend, the collapse in demand for the nation’s exports has shuttered factories and left millions jobless.

These countries, I believe, are trying to weigh the future risks of jettisoning the dollar as their main reserve currency against current financial problems they face by holding onto the Greenback.  Moves such as India show that they are increasingly deciding to test the waters by selling off their dollars in favor of gold, perhaps because an international basket of currencies might be too tough politically to create because the U.S. would admit it is done as a nation if it goes along with the proposal.

What does the Obama administration think about all of this?

A spokeswoman for the U.S. Treasury Department declined to comment on Mr. Zhou’s views. In recent weeks, senior Obama administration officials have sought to reassure Beijing that the current U.S. spending spree is a short-term effort to restart the stalled American economy, not evidence of long-term U.S. profligacy.

The problem with this view is that if Obama and the Democrats are successful in creating Obamakare, with its current $1 tillion plus bill (which will probably double or triple (at least) in short order) the U.S. will never be able to cut spending or increase tax revenues enough to bring the debt down.

Some countries are going to get stung - badly.

Some countries are going to get stung - badly.

And if Cap and Trade passes, its monies will be used to fund more social schemes the Democrats have in mind and, as a result of the increased tax burden on American families and businesses, economic activity will decrease as consumers find themselves with less money and businesses seek greener pastures.  And we all know that once a government program is created it is almost impossible to end.

What should be done is to reduce spending, scrap Obamakare, reduce the wasted monies spent on malpractice insurance and frivolous lawsuits, expand oil production (which will increase revenues and lower energy costs) and lower taxes to stimulate investor spending as well as offer consumers tax deductions if they reduce their debt.  Building nuclear power plants will also help lower energy costs and keep more dollars in the U.S. as our need to buy our energy overseas decreases.  Increase use of freight trains would also help move goods more efficiently, lower damage to our highways, and lower energy costs.

If we as a nation have learned anything it is that no institution is “too big to fail.”  The U.S. may be one of the strongest countries in the world in many areas but it is appearing that this is more so because our trading partners are paying for our debt sins – literally – more than because we can stand on our own.

Like this post? Subscribe to the Conservative perspective of Just Politics..? via RSS or Email and enjoy great articles like this every day or spread the word with one of the share buttons below!

Related posts:

    India and China Won’t Play the Foolish Liberal Games Obama Wants
    Is America’s Debt Party Coming to an End?
    Obama Motors: GM Using Taxpayer Dollars to Outsource
    Bye, Bye American Pie
    Addicted to Debt Not Responsibility
    Deficits, Debt, Bailouts: What Obama Should Learn from Germany

    7 Comments

  • jd says:

    when reached for comment, pelosi stated that “from our perspective, this is a victory for the dollar”

  • vulcanhammer says:

    The Obama regime’s attempt to reflate the economy out of the doldrums is going to have some serious consequences. Banks are sitting on large reserves and when they start to lend out en masse, inflation will rise, the dollar will spiral down further, and interest rate will rise. God help us.
    vulcanhammer´s last blog ..You can kiss $2.3 Billion bye-bye! My ComLuv Profile

  • burro says:

    An alternate reserve currency? Why will a different reserve currency be immune from the same problems? Nothing is more likely than the cyclicality of economic cycles. The Chinese can whine all they want. They get what they deserve. If they are so worried about the dollar, then why don’t they propose that their currency be used as the reserve currency? Oh yeah, if an institution other than Beijing was able to influence the demand for the Yuan and therefore increase its value, China’s export driven growth model would be done. I predict China’s economy collapses before the dollar is permanently damaged.
    burro´s last blog ..Another Messiah in the Making My ComLuv Profile

    • Harrison says:

      I think the idea is to have a “basket” of currencies… perhaps a PC way of cutting some influence from the dollar and our bad fiscal policy. China is in a bind because they need our spending but at the same time we’re killing the value of their dollar reserves.

  • burro says:

    A “basket” of currencies won’t solve the problem either. The current financial crisis was a result of financiers creating “baskets” of loans in the form of Asset Backed Securities and Credit Default Swaps. They believed that by spreading the risk across a range of debt instruments that these financial products would be sheltered from major decreases in value. Uhhh, this proved to not be the case. The opposite is true, the spreading of risk actually disguised the risk causing this great project in risk aversion to become one of the riskiest things we have ever done.

    On the other hand, what is stopping these countries from just buying a variety of foreign currencies for their own reserves, thus filling their own “basket”? Why wait for the IMF, if this is such a significant problem?

    China’s fiscal policies are as bad as ours, just in a different way. We are trying to finance our growth by borrowing against future growth. China finances their growth by borrowing against the future rise in their currency. Both scenarios lead to collapse if pursued with reckless abandon. It seems like when people bring up China and our debt, everyone assumes that they are on some kind of fiscal high ground. They are not. If a bout of massive inflation wasn’t going to be so painful for us, I would almost wish it on the Chinese, because they deserve it.
    burro´s last blog ..Another Messiah in the Making My ComLuv Profile

  • vulcanhammer says:

    Great post, Burro. I would also like to add that the credit rating agencies, which are government approved, contributed to disguised risk you correctly mention.
    vulcanhammer´s last blog ..The Pain Goes On My ComLuv Profile

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.