Whole Foods and Healthcare – What Irony!

Economics, Humor, Liberals, Social Issues — By Harrison on August 19, 2009 at 6:00 am
He had the courage to speak out.

He had the courage to speak out.

In San Francisco, where I live, Whole Foods is like the Liberal Utopia.  I see tons of the Liberal cars there all the time (namely the Toyota Prius) with people buying their natural organic whatever.  Whole Foods seems to cater to this crowd so much that I was shocked to read that it’s owner disagrees with President Obama’s healthcare plan and even wrote an article in the Wall Street Journal saying so.  You can read his piece here.  He starts it all out with the Margaret Thatcher quote of: “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run outof other people’s money.”

I like it already!  As you can imagine, this has deeply annoyed the hybrid-driving, latte-swilling set:

Michael Lent, another Whole Foods enthusiast in Long Beach, Calif., told ABCNews.com that he, too, will turn to other organic groceries for his weekly shopping list.

“I’m boycotting [Whole Foods] because all Americans need health care,” said Lent, 33, who used to visit his local Whole Foods “several times a week.”

“While Mackey is worried about health care and stimulus spending, he doesn’t seem too worried about expensive wars and tax breaks for the wealthy and big businesses such as his own that contribute to the deficit,” said Lent.

 I must admit, I thought Whole Foods was run by a Liberal (apparently most of their customers did, too).  So what did he write that was so terrible?

• Remove the legal obstacles that slow the creation of high-deductible health insurance plans and health savings accounts (HSAs).

• Equalize the tax laws so that employer-provided health insurance and individually owned health insurance have the same tax benefits.

• Repeal all state laws which prevent insurance companies from competing across state lines.

• Repeal government mandates regarding what insurance companies must cover.

• Enact tort reform to end the ruinous lawsuits that force doctors to pay insurance costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

• Make costs transparent so that consumers understand what health-care treatments cost.

• Enact Medicare reform.

• Finally, revise tax forms to make it easier for individuals to make a voluntary, tax-deductible donation to help the millions of people who have no insurance and aren’t covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Ive been supporting a Conservative comapny?!?

"I've been supporting a Conservative company?!?"

It all sounds very reasonable to me.  And Mackey speaks from experience as his company already provides healthcare insurance to 89% of of his employees (they must work 30 or more hours per week):

At Whole Foods we allow our team members to vote on what benefits they most want the company to fund. Our Canadian and British employees express their benefit preferences very clearly—they want supplemental health-care dollars that they can control and spend themselves without permission from their governments. Why would they want such additional health-care benefit dollars if they already have an “intrinsic right to health care”? The answer is clear—no such right truly exists in either Canada or the U.K.—or in any other country.

What is so ironic is this part:

The op-ed piece, which begins with a Margaret Thatcher quote, “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money,” has left some Whole Foods loyalists enraged. Many say Mackey was out of line to opine against the liberal base that has made his fortune possible.

Christine Taylor, a 34-year-old New Jersey shopper, vowed never to step foot in another Whole Foods again.

“I will no longer be shopping at Whole Foods,” Taylor told ABCNews.com. “I think a CEO should take care that if he speaks about politics, that his beliefs reflect at least the majority of his clients.”

I think what it comes down to is the Liberals think when a company owner speaks out and they agree that they are “doing the right thing” but when they disagree all of the sudden they should be quiet.

One can only hope that now Conservatives will start shopping at Whole Foods.  I applaud Mackey for his courage and laugh at Liberals who all this time thought they were supporting one of their own.

Like this post? Subscribe to the Conservative perspective of Just Politics..? via RSS or Email and enjoy great articles like this every day or spread the word with one of the share buttons below!

Related posts:

    The Irony: Obama Does Not Want to Subsidize People
    Which Brain is Working on Healthcare?
    Healthcare in France
    Exploring Liberal Myths: Healthcare
    Congress Won’t Take the Medicine They Prescribe
    Fun Facts About Socialized Healthcare!

Tags: , , , , , , ,

    14 Comments

  • Rob says:

    That’s really interesting. I’ve been to Whole Foods, and perceived it as a very liberal place, and now I’m realizing that it was my mistake to make a judgment like that. Who knew the CEO was conservative for a business like this?

    It’s interesting, though, when these people complain and say that they will go somewhere else. Where else but Whole Foods can you find groceries without all the additives, preservatives, nitrates, etc? It’s pretty much the only place I know of. Good luck to those looking for an alternative…. there isn’t one.
    Rob´s last blog ..How to quickly make money online that you’ve got no possibility of actually getting anytime soon My ComLuv Profile

    • Harrison says:

      I made the same mistake about it so we are all guilty of assumptions. I think Whole Foods has lost business because of the economy but the only competition to them I can think of is Walmart though they are not in as many places as WF is.

  • jd says:

    “Rather than increase government spending and control, we need to address the root causes of poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for his or her own health.”

    sweet jebus, no wonder so many leftists freaked. this guy is calling on personal responsibility for well being.

    he actually puts up some valid proposals for health care reform that will improve competition, and ultimately quality among health care providers.

    Mr. Mackey is no dummy. He knows who makes up a large contingent of his customers. He wrote this column knowing full well the public outlash against an unpopular opinion. Guys got stones.

  • Amazing…Sounds like he knows what he’s talking about..Another good point I read an article on Downsize DC where the government and AMA have effectively blocked holistic treatments and alternative treatments that may be and are just as effective..The liberals that want bigger government should look into this..

  • Troy says:

    Here’s the thing, and you hit it right on the nose. Most liberals only agree with anyone speaking out if they agree with them. People protesting Bush, awesome! People protest Obama, Un-American!

    No surprises its the same thing for CEO’s

    jd is absolutely correct as well, in fact I just wrote a piece on it on my blog, people need to be responsible for their own well being, and unfortunately, the American mindset is that of “I’m always right and who the hell are you to tell me different, doc?”
    Troy´s last blog ..Naming is Important My ComLuv Profile

  • We need to break the health care thing down to what it is. Everyone pays protection money every month to cover the small percentage of people that actually need care on any given day. That was the original concept. Insurance is, in essence, a socialist idea. Spread the risk by creating a pool of resources to cover catastrophe for all individuals. We have somehow turned it into something else – namely a way for corporations to make big profits and avoid doing their job of providing coverage through rejecting claims and making it very difficult and costly for the health care providers to collect on services rendered. This has driven up costs to a ridiculous level that only 3% of the population can actually afford. We have to get real here if we want to see any real change that would serve the country. If not run by the government then at least the money should not go to the insurance corporations but rather to a publicly held trust where the actually people who are supposed to be covered and otherwise effected have some sort of oversight and control over the vast amount of money the public is paying for heath care services via their insurance premiums. This would include reducing the out of control costs for heath care services and eliminating the profit motive for private industry. Also, charge premiums of things that people buy that are known to lead to disease such as meat, fried foods, refined products and so forth so that the people most likely to become sick are paying up front into their own future heath care for the diseases they will get from consuming unhealthy food-like items.

    Buy my new book:
    The Fall of the Republican Party – What’s Left of the Right?
    http://smiggley.com

    • Harrison says:

      Walt you have tried to plug your book on at least ten articles today. I will let this post stay but you’re a confused man. Socialism isn’t concerned with making a profit or breaking even which is why it doesn’t work. Private insurance is not a socialist idea and if you take away the profit you will not have it anymore you will have rationed government care and higher taxes. Poor people can’t pay for it so you over burden the people who create jobs and buy stuff. Your book should be about the fall of the Democratic Party because their popularity is only going down according to every poll out there.

  • rose says:

    i found a funny article on whole foods product names…worth a read to lighten the debate: http://onthebutton.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/wholefoods/ enjoy!

  • “You can only speak out, Mr. CEO, if you agree with us, your customers! Otherwise, shove it, we don’t want to hear your opinion.”

    Ah, freedom of speech at it’s finest.
    Liberty Belle´s last blog ..Utopian Kingdom My ComLuv Profile

  • vulcanhammer says:

    The only people that will be hurt by these boycotts will be Whole Foods employees. You know, the lady with the dreads and tats that loves to believe that organic food is great and all. Liberals do eat their own.
    vulcanhammer´s last blog ..Funny Computer Stories My ComLuv Profile

  • Al says:

    Another interesting post, Harrison. Folks are beginning to wake up and realize that pretty speeches from a gifted orator is still fluff no matter how one slices it.
    Al´s last blog ..Observations My ComLuv Profile

  • Roger says:

    The main problem with Obama is the fact that the the democratic party has very conflicting interests, while the republican party itself is quite regimented since the Regen era.

    Obama has pretty talk, and is pretty much one of the best diplomatic speakers I’ve seen out there. But the fact of the matter is that the interest among the democratic party is splintered. Hence, his hands are a bit tied. Polls are going down for Obama yes, but they’re still relatively popular. The perception on congress however, is that none of them can actually get anything done.

    Although I often disagree with the Republican view points, this is one thing that has allowed them to push their agenda verses the democrats. Republicans are organized. Democrats are not.
    Roger´s last blog ..Government vs Private My ComLuv Profile

  • Burro says:

    Business boycotts are just as childish as yelling matches. This is a great response from an ideology that is accusing conservatives of not engaging in rational discussion and debate.
    Burro´s last blog ..Whole Foods Boycott: Yet one more form of mindless protest My ComLuv Profile

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.